Skip to main content

 iRubric for Sakai

iRubric: Discussion Rubric

iRubric: Discussion Rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Discussion Rubric 
Discussion Rubric
This rubric will be used to evaluation your participation in the discussions for each module.
Rubric Code: DXW86C5
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Discussion Rubric
  Poor

0 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

4 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Timeliness
5 pts

The timing of participation in this forum encouraged meaningful dialogue on the topic.
Poor

All postings to this discussion were made Sunday afternoon or evening eliminating opportunity for meaningful dialogue.
Fair

The initial post was made late Saturday or on Sunday limiting opportunity for dialogue. The timing of responses to others and follow-up posts seriously limited opportunity for dialogue.
Good

The initial post was made by Friday so others could respond. Responses to others and follow-up posts were made within a time-frame that permitted some dialogue.
Excellent

The initial post was made Thursday, or earlier, allowing ample opportunity for others to respond. Responses to others and follow-up posts were made within a time-frame that invites dialogue.
Understanding of Topic
10 pts

The postings indicate that the participant has a good understanding of the "psychological principle" that is the focus of the forum. There is a strong indication that the participant has read the assigned material in the text.
Poor

Postings are unrelated to the topic or reflect a lack of understanding.There is little or no relationship to the assigned readings in the text.
Fair

Postings reflect awareness of topic but lack clarity and depth. Ideas expressed seemed to be based on personal experience or general knowledge. There was not convincing evidence that the participant had read the text.
Good

Postings reflect an familiarity with some aspects of the topic but lack in depth and completeness. The postings suggest a casual skimming of the text.
Excellent

Postings reflect a good understanding of the topic suggesting a careful reading of the assigned chapters in the text. Some reference to the text or other materials were included to support ideas expressed.
Expansion of ideas
10 pts

Postings expand the ideas under discussion by adding alternative interpretations of the text, relating personal experiences, and/or asking questions to encourage deeper thinking.
Poor

Postings are vague statements related to the topic, or move the discussion to a different topic altogether.
Fair

Postings repeat information provided by other participants without adding new ideas, alternative interpretations nor personal perspective.
Good

Postings expand existing ideas in the dialogue but do not offer new perspectives or raise questions to stimulate thinking.
Excellent

Postings contributes a new idea, relate a personal experience, offer alternative interpretations, and/or ask a relevant question that moves the discussion forward.
Participation in Dialogue
10 pts

There is active participation in dialogue with "conversations" with two or more participants.
Poor

The only posting is a response to the "Discussion Starter"
Fair

In addition to a response to the "Discussion Starter" there are responses to 1 or 2 other members of the group. Those responses contribute little to the dialogue. There is more sense of "completing the assignment" than engaging in meaningful dialogue on the topic.
Good

Responses reflecting an understanding of and sensitivity to the feelings of a minimum of 2 other posters are offered. Evidence of true participating in a dialogue is present.
Excellent

There are meaningful and sensitive responses to 3 or more posts providing strong evidence of willingness to engage in and continue a dialogue.



Keywords:
  • MUS 6685

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n98