Skip to main content

 iRubric for Sakai

iRubric: Discussion Board UFO rubric

iRubric: Discussion Board UFO rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Discussion Board UFO 
Management Case Study UFO
In an effort to connect content from the lectures and readings to real-world, sport-related issues, students will participate in an online community with fellow classmates via an online discussion board. Throughout the semester, students will post original content, respond to questions provided by the instructor, and engage in discourse with other students.
Rubric Code: XXWW56W
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric DISCUSSION BOARD POST
  Unacceptable

Performance in this category was unacceptable or requirements were unfulfilled.

0 pts

Acceptable

Performance in this category met some expectations.

2.5 pts

Excellent

This category item met all expectations.

5 pts

Original Post

Unacceptable

Simple posts that lack insight, depth, or are superficial. Entries tend to be short and frequently irrelevant to the key question. Does not express opinion clearly. Shows little understanding.

Poor spelling and grammatical errors in several posts. Written in informal language, abbreviations or txt.
Acceptable

Posts are rather simple but show some insight, depth, or connection to the key question. Some material may be irrelevant, but personal opiniion is appropriately expressed and posts as a whole show understanding.

Posts have few spelling and grammatical errors. Text construction is mostly formal with few abbreviations or txt style language.
Excellent

Posts show insight, depth, and understanding. They connect with the topic and include references to supporting material (e.g., URLs, files). Personal opinion is appropriately expressed and clearly related to the thread.

Posts consistently show good grammar, have no spelling errors, and are presented in a structure/format that enhances readability.
DISCUSSION BOARD REPLY
  Unacceptable

Performance in this category was unacceptable or requirements were unfulfilled.

0 pts

Needs Improvement

Performance in this category met some expectations.

1.25 pts

Acceptable

This category item met all expectations.

2.5 pts

Reply 1

Unacceptable

Simple replies that lack insight, depth, or are superficial. Entries tend to be short and frequently irrelevant to the original post. Does not express opinion clearly. Shows little understanding.

Poor spelling and grammatical errors in several replies. Written in informal language, abbreviations or txt.
Needs Improvement

Replies are rather simple but show some insight, depth, or connection to the original post. Some material may be irrelevant, but personal opiniion is appropriately expressed and posts as a whole show understanding.

Replies have few spelling and grammatical errors. Text construction is mostly formal with few abbreviations or txt style language.
Acceptable

Replies show insight, depth, and understanding. They connect with the original post and add to that post by including references to supporting material (e.g., URLs, files). Personal opinion is appropriately expressed & clearly related to original post.

Replies consistently show good grammar, have no spelling errors, and are presented in a structure/format that enhances readability.
Reply 2

Unacceptable

Simple replies that lack insight, depth, or are superficial. Entries tend to be short and frequently irrelevant to the original post. Does not express opinion clearly. Shows little understanding.

Poor spelling and grammatical errors in several replies. Written in informal language, abbreviations or txt.
Needs Improvement

Replies are rather simple but show some insight, depth, or connection to the original post. Some material may be irrelevant, but personal opiniion is appropriately expressed and posts as a whole show understanding.

Replies have few spelling and grammatical errors. Text construction is mostly formal with few abbreviations or txt style language.
Acceptable

Replies show insight, depth, and understanding. They connect with the original post and add to that post by including references to supporting material (e.g., URLs, files). Personal opinion is appropriately expressed & clearly related to original post.

Replies consistently show good grammar, have no spelling errors, and are presented in a structure/format that enhances readability.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n98