Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Share
help_outline
help
iRubric for Sakai
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: AWHI - Regulations Discussion Board Post rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
AWHI - Regulations Discussion Board Post
AWHI - Croc Essay
Rubric Code:
XXW4366
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Biology
Type:
Homework
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
AWHI - Regulations Discussion Board
Descriptions
1
1 pts
2
2 pts
3
3 pts
4
4 pts
Review
1
Summary is unclear and/or disorganized. Paragraphs are under minimum length. Much information missing about the regulations, permits or management plan found. No “Take home message” defined. Document not attached.
2
Summary is somewhat unclear or disorganized. Paragraphs are under minimum length. Mostly summarizes the regulations, permits or management plan found, with some information missing. Wrong “Take home message” or major point of the document defined. Document attached or linked.
3
Summary is organized, logical and clearly written. Paragraphs are complete and meet minimum requirements. Generally summarizes the regulations, permits or management plan found. “Take home message” or major point of the document defined, but not clearly. Document attached or linked.
4
Summary is well organized, logical and clearly written. Paragraphs are complete and meet minimum requirements. Clearly summarizes the regulations, permits or management plan found. “Take home message” or major points of the document clearly defined. Document attached or linked.
Critique
1
Response demonstrates a lack of reflection on, or personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the document. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples, when applicable, are not provided.
2
Response demonstrates a minimal reflection on, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the document. Viewpoints and interpretations are unsupported, or supported with flawed arguments. Examples, when applicable, are not provided or are irrelevant to the assignment.
3
Response demonstrates a general reflection on, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the document. Viewpoints and interpretations are supported. Appropriate examples are provided, as applicable.
4
Response demonstrates an in-depth reflection on, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the document. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well supported. Clear, detailed examples are provided, as applicable.
Classmate Responses
0
0 pts
1
1 pts
2
2 pts
Enter Title
(N/A)
Response 1
0
Writing is unclear and disorganized. Thoughts ramble and make little sense. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples/anecdotes, when applicable, are irrelevant to the assignment or are not provided.
1
Writing is mostly clear, concise, and well organized with good sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. Viewpoints and interpretations are supported. Appropriate examples/anecdotes are provided, as applicable
2
Writing is clear, concise, well organized with excellent sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well supported. Clear, detailed examples from what was learned in class or readings, or personal anecdotes are provided, as applicable.
Enter Title
Response 2
0
Writing is unclear and disorganized. Thoughts ramble and make little sense. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples/anecdotes, when applicable, are irrelevant to the assignment or are not provided.
1
Writing is mostly clear, concise, and well organized with good sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. Viewpoints and interpretations are supported. Appropriate examples/anecdotes are provided, as applicable
2
Writing is clear, concise, well organized with excellent sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well supported. Clear, detailed examples from what was learned in class or readings, or personal anecdotes are provided, as applicable.
Enter Title
Subjects:
Biology
Types:
Homework
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Biology rubrics
More Homework rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C)
Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.