Skip to main content

 iRubric for Sakai

iRubric: Writing Assignment #5 rubric

iRubric: Writing Assignment #5 rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Writing Assignment #5 
Rubric Code: XB8C6B
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Writing Assignment #5
  0%

0 pts

60%

0 pts

70%

4.9 pts

80%

5.6 pts

90%

6.3 pts

100%

7 pts

Quality of Research Question

0%

Question covers something that is already known.
60%

The question covers an area of knowledge that is partially known without acknowledging what is known.
70%

Question only partially covers a gap in scientific knowledge in forensic entomology; the question is well written.
80%

Question mostly covers a gap in scientific knowledge in forensic entomology; the question is well written.
90%

Question covers a gap in scientific knowledge in forensic entomology; the question is well written.
100%

Question covers a gap in scientific knowledge in forensic entomology; the question is eloquently written and completely covers the identified gap in knowledge.
Writing Assignment #5
  0%

0 pts

60%

9 pts

70%

10.5 pts

80%

12 pts

90%

13.5 pts

100%

15 pts

Quality of Introduction

0%

Does not cover the background of the question
60%

Contains an introduction including the current state of research on the question, but is missing more than three major points concerning the biology and/or the background of the question
70%

Contains an introduction including the current state of research on the question, but is missing two or three major points concerning the biology and/or the background of the question
80%

Contains an introduction including the current state of research on the question. May be missing no more than one major point concerning the biology and/or the background of the question
90%

Contains a thorough introduction including the current state of research on the question.
100%

Contains a thorough and eloquently written introduction including the current state of research on the question.
Writing Assignment #5
  0%

0 pts

60%

3 pts

70%

3.5 pts

80%

4 pts

90%

4.5 pts

100%

5 pts

Quality of Hypothesis

0%

Hypothesis does not cover information in the introduction and/or the hypothesis does not make any logical sense given the introduction.
60%

Hypothesis misses major information covered in the introduction and/or. hypothesis makes little logical sense given the introduction.
70%

Hypothesis may miss some major information covered in the introduction and/or. hypothesis makes little logical sense given the introduction
80%

Hypothesis encapsulates the background information, research, and knowledge about the research question, but may leave out some known information. hypothesis makes some logical sense given the introduction.
90%

Hypothesis completely encapsulates the background information, research, and knowledge about the research question; hypothesis makes logical sense given the introduction.
100%

Hypothesis eloquently and completely encapsulates the background information, research, and knowledge about the research question; hypothesis makes logical sense given the introduction.
Quality of Procedure

0%

Misses more than 2 major portions of the procedure.
60%

Contains a inadequate synopsis and/or misses more than one major portion of the procedure.
70%

Contains a minimal synopsis covering proposed research procedure and/or misses one major portion.
80%

Contains a synopsis covering the proposed research procedure. May include partial materials list and/or does not contain adequate
90%

Contains a thorough synopsis covering the proposed research procedure. Does not include materials list nor go over three
100%

Contains a thorough and eloquently written synopsis covering the proposed research procedure. Does not include materials list
Writing Assignment #5
  0%

0 pts

60%

2.4 pts

70%

2.8 pts

80%

3.2 pts

90%

3.6 pts

100%

4 pts

Format

0%

More than three of the following: sections improperly formatted; and/or MLA Format not used; and/or minimum number of paragraphs not reached or maximum number of paragraphs exceeded.
60%

No more than three of the following: sections improperly formatted; and/or MLA Format not used; and/or minimum number of paragraphs not reached or maximum number of paragraphs exceeded.
70%

No more than two of the following: sections improperly formatted; and/or MLA Format not used; and/or minimum number of paragraphs not reached or maximum number of paragraphs exceeded.
80%

No more than one section improperly formatted; and/or MLA Format not used; and/or minimum number of paragraphs not reached or maximum number of paragraphs exceeded
90%

All sections present with proper MLA format of inline references and bibliography. Minimum number of paragraphs reached and maximum number of paragraphs not exceeded.
100%

All sections present with proper MLA format of inline references and bibliography. Minimum number of paragraphs reached and maximum number of paragraphs not exceeded.
Bibliography

0%

Bibliography missing most of the articles, not included in the paper, or articles not referenced inline at all.
60%

Bibliography is missing more than 5 articles; articles referenced incorrectly either inline or in bibliography. Missing the correct number of primary and secondary articles for all species
70%

Bibliography is missing 4 or 5 articles; all articles referenced in correctly but may not be in MLA format, both in line and in the bibliography. Missing the correct number of primary and secondary articles for two or three species.
80%

Bibliography is missing 3 or 4 articles; all articles referenced in correctly but may not be in MLA format, both in line and in the bibliography. Missing the correct number of primary and secondary articles for only one species.
90%

Bibliography meets the minimum number of articles; all articles referenced in MLA format, both in line and in the bibliography; at least 3 primary and 1 secondary article per species.
100%

Bibliography goes above and beyond minimum of assignment; all articles referenced in MLA format, both in line and in the bibliography; at least 3 primary and 1 secondary article per species.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n16