iRubric: Aquatic Animal ppt - Cons Iss rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Aquatic Animal ppt - Cons Iss Rubric Code: WXWA257 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Biology Type: Homework Grade Levels: (none)

Aquatic Animal ppt - Cons Iss Descriptions
	Poor 1 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 4 pts
Species choice and posting	Poor	Poor -Failed to choose species and/or post on discussion board -Forgot either scientific of common name of species -Uploaded ppt without appropriate file name	Fair	Good -Chose appropriate species and posted both scientific and common name on discussion board -Uploaded ppt using appropriate file name
Natural History	Poor	Poor -Did not provide enough information or provided no information on basic biology, origin of species	Fair	Good -Adequately described basic biology, origin of species
Habitat	Poor	Poor -Did not provide enough information or provided no information on habitat and range of species	Fair	Good -Adequately described habitat and range of species
Related Conservation Issues	Poor	Poor -Did not provide enough information or provided no information on conservation issues and potential mitigation	Fair	Good -Adequately described conservation issues and potential mitigation
Overall Presentation	Poor	Poor -Presentation was less than 10 slides -Poor use of bullet points and/or lack of bullet points -Information is not as logically sequenced or not at all -Font not always easy to read or completely unreadable -Background not well-chosen and detracts from some or all of the slides -Graphics are missing or fail to support slides -Slide animations are excessive	Fair	Good -Presentation was at least 10-15 slides -Excellent use of bullet points -Able to anticipate type of material on next slide -Font enhances readability and content -Background is well chosen and does not detract from the slide -Graphics support the slide appropriately -Slide animations do not interfere with flow of presentation
Grammar and References	Poor	Poor -4 or more grammatical, punctuation errors -Writing is not as clear or concise, less-organized -Proofreading is not apparent -One or more references missing -Less than half or none of references are books or scientific articles -References and citations not in APA format or not included	Fair	Good -3 or fewer grammatical, punctuation errors -Writing is clear, concise, and well-organized -Proofreading is apparent -Provided references for all sources and all images -Approximately half of references are books or scientific peer-reviewed journal articles -References and citations properly formatted to APA style