Skip to main content

 iRubric for Sakai

iRubric: Discussion of Topic/Skype Interview rubric

iRubric: Discussion of Topic/Skype Interview rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Discussion of Topic/Skype Interview 
Rubric Code: VXW5ABB
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: Attendance  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Discussion of Topic/Skype Interview
Enter rubric description
  Poor

0 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

5 pts

Scheduling
5 pts

The student scheduled the Skype conversation in a timely manner and kept the scheduled appointment.

Poor

Did not schedule conversation and/or did not keep scheduled appointment.
Fair

Was late in either scheduling conversation or for the appointment.
Good

Scheduled call in timely manner and was on-time for appointment.
Preparation: Journal Access
5 pts

The student has accessed the three journals assigned.

Poor

It did not appear that student had attempted to access the assigned journals.
Fair

There was evidence that student had made an attempt to access at least one of the journals, but did not display adequate awareness of all three. The student had a vague awareness of the topics of published articles.
Good

Conversation provided evidence that student had successfully accessed the three assigned journals and adequately reviewed Table of Contents of a representative sampling of those journals.
Familiarity with topics
5 pts

The student has reviewed Table of Contents of a sampling of journals and is conversant with topics within Psychology of Music.

Poor

Conversation revealed little awareness of topics investigated in Psychology of Music.
Fair

The conversation indicated that the student is aware of only a few topics investigated in Psychology of Music
Good

The conversation indicated that the student is familiar with a wide range of topics investigated in Psychology of Music.
Preparation: Topic Possibilities
10 pts

The student has thoughtfully considered a variety of possible topics, narrowed possibilities for the course project and has a rational for those choices.

Poor

There was little evidence that the student is aware of appropriate topics in Psychology of Music nor that he/she has given thought to a focus for the final project.
Fair

The student discussed a number of possible topics, but does not appear to have a basis for narrowing the field or choosing a topic for the final project.
Good

There was evidence that student had thoughtfully considered a range of topics for the Review of Literature and was beginning to narrow focus on at least a few. A well thought-out rational is offered for those choices.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n16