Skip to main content

 iRubric for Sakai

iRubric: Rubric for Grading Mod 4 Peer Review (Dr. Gazzaley Seminary)

iRubric: Rubric for Grading Mod 4 Peer Review (Dr. Gazzaley Seminary)


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Rubric for Grading Mod 4 Peer Review (Dr. Gazzaley Seminary) 
Rubric Code: NXWCB73
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Summary
Enter rubric description
  No Answer

0 pts

Poor

0.75 pts

Fair

0.9 pts

Good

1 pts

Excellent

1.25 pts

To what extent did the peer review

...correctly evaluate whether the summary identified the primary question driving the article. The primary question driving Dr. Gazzaley's research as described in the seminar was "why is it that memory can be so fragile...what determines whether we remember or not...how does ability to remember change with age..."

No Answer
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
To what extent did the peer review

...correctly evaluate whether the summary identified the data used to answer the primary question driving the research. The data used to answer the primary question included..."performing experiments that determines the effects of interruptions, diversions, distractions on ability to remember faces or scenes and how responses vary with age..."

No Answer
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
To what extent did the peer review

...correctly evaluate whether the summary identified the important implications of the research. The important implications include..."exposure to interferences may be limiting ability to learn...driving is impaired by cell phone conversation but not talking with person next to you...electronic interruptions while studying reduces long term memory...electronic interactions prevents development of normal reading of facial and body language by pre-teens...electronic interruptions causes multi-billion dollar losses in business..."

No Answer
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
To what extent did the peer review

...correctly evaluate whether the summary indentified important future research. The important future research includes..."differences between genders...ability to train the brain with software..."

No Answer
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n16