Skip to main content

 iRubric for Sakai

iRubric: Week 1 Discussion Board Rubric (max points = 25)

iRubric: Week 1 Discussion Board Rubric (max points = 25)


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Week 1 Discussion Board Rubric (max points = 25) 
Week 1 Discussion Board Rubric (max points = 25)
Module 1
Rubric Code: LXWB84C
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Week 1 Discussion
  Exemplary 3

3 pts

Satisfactory 2

2 pts

Marginal 1

1 pts

Unacceptable/Incomplete 0

0 pts

Relevance to Discussion prompt

Exemplary 3

The reflection
directly addresses
key issues,
questions, or
problems related
to the discussion
prompt.
Satisfactory 2

The reflection
addresses key
issues, questions,
or problems related
to the discussion
prompt, but in
some cases only
indirectly or
obliquely.
Marginal 1

The reflection does
not directly
address the
discussion prompt
but connections
could be inferred.
Unacceptable/Incomplete 0

Reflection is incomplete, not
submitted, inaccurate, or
inappropriate, and the work
does not meet necessary
requirements.
Insight on Issue

Exemplary 3

The reflection
offers original or
thoughtful insight,
analysis, or
observation that
demonstrates a
strong grasp of
concepts and ideas
pertaining to the
discussion prompt.
Satisfactory 2

The reflection
offers some insight,
analysis, or
observation on the
discussion prompt,
but may not
demonstrate a full
understanding or
knowledge of the
discussion
prompt’s concepts
and ideas.
Marginal 1

The reflection does
not offer any
significant insight,
analysis, or
observation related
to the discussion
prompt. No
knowledge or
understanding is
demonstrated
regarding concepts
and ideas
pertaining to the
discussion prompt.
Unacceptable/Incomplete 0

Reflection is incomplete, not submitted, inaccurate, or inappropriate, and the work does not meet necessary
requirements.
Support for Statements

Exemplary 3

The reflection
supports all claims
and opinions with
rational argument
and/or evidence
including citations.
Satisfactory 2

The reflection
generally supports
claims and
opinions with
evidence or
argument, but may
leave some
unsupported
opinions.
Marginal 1

The reflection does
not support its
claims with either
evidence or
argument, and
may simply be an
expression of
personal opinion
Unacceptable/Incomplete 0

Reflection is incomplete, not submitted, inaccurate, or inappropriate, and the work does not meet necessary
requirements.
Response to Classmate #1

Exemplary 3

Commentary
addresses key
issues, questions,
or problems
related to the issue,
applying the
content of readings
well and in a
helpful way.
Satisfactory 2

Commentary offers
insight, analysis, or
observation on the
issue, but may not
demonstrate a full
understanding or
knowledge of
concepts and ideas
pertaining to
peer’s post or
readings .
Marginal 1

Commentary does
not directly
address the content
of peer’s post or
readings.
Unacceptable/Incomplete 0

Commentary is incomplete, not posted, inaccurate, or inappropriate.
Response to Classmate #2

Exemplary 3

Commentary
addresses key
issues, questions,
or problems
related to the issue,
applying the
content of readings
well and in a
helpful way.
Satisfactory 2

Commentary offers
insight, analysis, or
observation on the
issue, but may not
demonstrate a full
understanding or
knowledge of
concepts and ideas
pertaining to
peer’s post or
readings .
Marginal 1

Commentary does
not directly
address the content
of peer’s post or
readings.
Unacceptable/Incomplete 0

Commentary is incomplete, not posted, inaccurate, or inappropriate.
Week 1 Discussion
  Complete 5

5 pts

Unacceptable/Incomplete 0

0 pts

N/A

(N/A)

N/A

(N/A)

Skype Conference With Instructor

Complete 5

Communicated
with instructor in
a timely manner
and completed
brief Skype
conference with
instructor.
Unacceptable/Incomplete 0

Skype conference not
completed or instructor was
not communicated with in
time to complete.
N/A
N/A
Introduction Post

Complete 5

Name, geographic
location, teaching
level/discipline,
favorite vernacular
musician, and
experience with
vernacular music
posted as
introduction to
first discussion
board post.
Unacceptable/Incomplete 0

Name, geographic
location, teaching
level/discipline,
favorite vernacular
musician, and
experience with
vernacular music
posted as
introduction to
first discussion
board post.
N/A
N/A




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n16