iRubric: Management Case Study UFO rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Management Case Study UFO Management Case Study The purposes of this team project are to use unique case studies to expand our understanding of the issues that can arise in the management of ordinary organizations, and to apply this knowledge to the context of sport and physical activity administration. Rubric Code: HXWW5X9 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Business Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

6-PT SCALE Descriptions
	Unacceptable Performance in this category was unacceptable or requirements were unfulfilled. 0 pts	Poor Performance in this category was below expectations. 1.5 pts	Fair Performance in this category met expectations. 3 pts	Good Performance in this category was above expectations. 4.5 pts	Excellent This category item was well above expectations. 6 pts
CONTENTS
Summary The presentation should summarize the contents of the case study, providing the audience with enough background to understand the article's main purpose and the key players involved.	Unacceptable	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Critical Analysis Presenters should provide a thoughtful critique of the author's primary argument.	Unacceptable	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Application The team should discuss how its article could be applied to the management of a sport organization, drawing from both course material and existing knowledge of sport.	Unacceptable	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
4-PT SCALE
	Unacceptable Performance in this category was unacceptable or requirements were unfulfilled. 0 pts	– (N/A)	Needs Improvement Performance in this category was below expectations. 2 pts	– (N/A)	Acceptable Performance in this category met expectations. 4 pts
DESIGN
Clarity of Design Information should be well organized, graphics should enhance screen text and reinforce the presentation, and information should be easily understandable (when applicable).	Unacceptable	–	Needs Improvement	–	Acceptable
Spelling and Grammar Document(s) and/or oral presentation should be free of spelling and grammatical errors. When applicable, text should be clear and coherent.	Unacceptable	–	Needs Improvement	–	Acceptable
DELIVERY
Timing The presentation (excluding audience questions) should be between 8-12 minutes minutes.	Unacceptable	–	Needs Improvement The presentation was less than 8 minutes or greater than 12 minutes.	–	Acceptable The presentation (excluding audience questions) was between 8-12 minutes.
PEER EVALUATION SCALE
	No Submission 0 pts	– (N/A)	Fair 2.5 pts	– (N/A)	Excellent 5 pts
PEER EVALUATIONS
Peer Evaluation Submitted	No Submission	–	Fair	–	Excellent
Peers' Evaluation of You	No Submission	–	Fair	–	Excellent