Skip to main content

 iRubric for Sakai

iRubric: Mitigation Assignment - Cons Iss rubric

iRubric: Mitigation Assignment - Cons Iss rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Mitigation Assignment - Cons Iss 
Rubric Code: HXWA24B
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Homework  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Mitigation Assignment - Cons Iss
  Points

1 pts

Points

2 pts

Points

3 pts

Points

4 pts

Points

5 pts

Points

6 pts

Points

7 pts

Points

8 pts

Article Summary

Points
Points

Summaries are unclear and/or disorganized. Paragraphs do not meet sentence requirements. Much information missing about what the articles were about and how they described an issue as it relates to mitigation. Articles not attached. Viewpoints, interpretations, and opinions are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Third opinion paragraph does not contain reasons for opinions provided, as applicable.
Points
Points

Summaries are somewhat unclear or disorganized. Paragraph does not meet sentence requirements. Mostly indicated what the articles are about and how they described an issue as it relates to mitigation with some information missing. Articles attached. Viewpoints, interpretations, and opinions are unsupported, or supported with flawed arguments. Third opinion paragraph contains unclear reasons for opinions provided, as applicable.
Points
Points

Summary are organized, logical and clearly written. Paragraph meets sentence requirements. Generally indicated what the article was about and how it described an issue as it relates to mitigation. Articles attached. Summaries include viewpoints, interpretations, and opinions which are supported. Third opinion paragraph contains appropriate reasons for opinions provided, as applicable.
Points
Points

Summaries are well organized, logical and clearly written. Paragraph meets sentence requirements. Clearly indicated what the article was about and how it described an issue as it relates to mitigation. Articles attached. Summaries include viewpoints, interpretations, and opinions which are insightful and well supported. Third opinion paragraph is clear, detailed reasoning for opinions is provided, as applicable.
Responses
  Poor

0 pts

Average

1 pts

Good

2 pts

Enter Title

(N/A)

Enter Title

(N/A)

Enter Title

(N/A)

Enter Title

(N/A)

Enter Title

(N/A)

Response -1

Poor

Writing is unclear and disorganized. Thoughts ramble and make little sense. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples/anecdotes, when applicable, are irrelevant to the assignment or are not provided.
Average

Writing is mostly clear, concise, and well organized with good sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. Viewpoints and interpretations are supported. Appropriate examples/anecdotes are provided, as applicable
Good

Writing is clear, concise, well organized with excellent sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well supported. Clear, detailed examples from what was learned in class or readings, or personal anecdotes are provided, as applicable.
Enter Title
Enter Title
Enter Title
Enter Title
Enter Title
Response - 2

Poor

Writing is unclear and disorganized. Thoughts ramble and make little sense. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples/anecdotes, when applicable, are irrelevant to the assignment or are not provided.
Average

Writing is mostly clear, concise, and well organized with good sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. Viewpoints and interpretations are supported. Appropriate examples/anecdotes are provided, as applicable
Good

Writing is clear, concise, well organized with excellent sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well supported. Clear, detailed examples from what was learned in class or readings, or personal anecdotes are provided, as applicable.
Enter Title
Enter Title
Enter Title
Enter Title
Enter Title




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.
Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n98