iRubric: SOAP Scoring Rubric 9-3-2014

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
SOAP Scoring Rubric 9-3-2014 SOAP scoring rubric 2 Rubric Code: AXWB39B Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Pharmacy Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Graduate, Post Graduate

Enter rubric title Descriptions 10 % Subjective Criteria
	Not acceptable 0 pts	Needs Improvement 3 pts	Competent 4 pts	Capstone 5 pts
Clear 1 %	Not acceptable CC missing to understand patients main concern	Needs Improvement CC identified and HPI recorded are not clear	Competent Demographic reported information, CC, and HPI reported are clear and accurate with minor errors of omission	Capstone Demographic reported information, CC, and HPI are also quantified and concise
Complete pertinent 0.5 % Enter description	Not acceptable Data to supports the assessment is inaccurate (medication, social history)	Needs Improvement Additional pertinent information necessary to support the assessment is present (complete)	Competent Additional pertinent information necessary to support the assessment is present and organized	Capstone Additional pertinent information necessary to support the assessment is in an clear, concise, and orderly manner
Only Pertinent 0.5 % Enter description	Not acceptable Erroneous data leads unclear clinical picture	Needs Improvement Excessive Dx data listed	Competent Only information directly pertaining to assessment is included	Capstone The learner clearly understands what is pertinent to the patient's clinical picture
Objective Criteria 10 %
	Not acceptable 0 pts	Needs Improvement 3 pts	Competent 4 pts	Capstone 5 pts
Medication list 0.5 % Medication list is in the subjective section if reported and Objective if administration verified	Not acceptable Current medications & allergies inaccurately obtained and verified	Needs Improvement Current medications & allergies incompletely obtained and verified	Competent Current medications & allergies accurately reflect the administration record and verified	Capstone Current medication list references pertinent medication changes and addressed any non-prescription and alternative remedies
Complete pertinent 0.5 %	Not acceptable Necessary vital signs, physical exam, labs, microbiology, & drug levels to support assessment are inaccurate	Needs Improvement Necessary vital signs, physical exam, labs, tests, microbiology, & drug levels to support assessment are missing	Competent Necessary vital signs, physical exam, labs, tests, microbiology, & drug levels based on medication and medical condition are included	Capstone Necessary data are included for a concise objective section
Clear 0.5 %	Not acceptable Objective data is inaccurate when data was obtained	Needs Improvement Objective data is unexplored when data was obtained or omitted	Competent Objective data is clear when data was obtained	Capstone Objective data is organized to link the data with timing of the medication
Only Pertinent 0.5 %	Not acceptable Erroneous lab data listed	Needs Improvement Excessive data is listed to cause confusion or over looks key data	Competent No excessive data is listed to cause confusion or risk over looking key data	Capstone Only directly pertinent data are included for a concise objective section
ASSESSMENT criteria 40 %
	Not Acceptable 0 pts	Needs Improvement 3 pts	Competent 4 pts	Capstone 5 pts
Explanation of issue 20 %	Not Acceptable Critical issue is not clear	Needs Improvement Issue to be considered critically is described but ambiguities or unexplored	Competent Medication- related problem(s) is stated in the context of the therapeutic goal (s)	Capstone Medication- related problem is interpreted using appropriate data/evidence. Lower priority is referred for follow up.
Therapeutic goal 20 %	Not Acceptable Therapeutic goal(s) is not appropriate	Needs Improvement Therapeutic goal(s) is not clear	Competent Therapeutic goal(s) appropriate for the patient and their medications	Capstone Therapeutic goal(s) appropriate for the patient with proper citation
Selecting,eveluating 20 % Selecting, evaluating and using information to investigate a point of view	Not Acceptable Data is taken from a source without interpretation/synthesis	Needs Improvement Data is taken from a source with some interpretation but not enough to develop a coherent analysis	Competent Labs and physical findings are interpreted using logical reasoning to establish why or when it is a problem enough to develop a coherent analysis	Capstone All pertinent findings are interpreted at the depth necessary to explain why or when it would be a problem to develop a concise and timely coherent analysis
Student's position 20 %	Not Acceptable Position lacks context	Needs Improvement Position is clear and acknowledges a different side; however importance of treatment not clear	Competent Applies creditable evidence reflecting sound position necessary to support medication, dose, route, frequency, & monitoring	Capstone Position is clear /concise and considers assumptions or complexities for a creditable and convincing assessment
PLAN criteria 40 %
	Not acceptable 0 pts	Needs Improvement 3 pts	Competent 4 pts	Capstone 5 pts
Clear and Complete 20 %	Not acceptable Plan is missing dose or frequency	Needs Improvement Plan is not clear enough for prescriber to write order	Competent Primary plan is clear and complete enough for prescriber to write order	Capstone Pertinent plan is associated with necessary administration instructions
Appropriate Clinical Option 20 %	Not acceptable Plan is an inappropriate clinical option for the patient that could harm patient	Needs Improvement Plan does not addresses cost or other health concern(s) for the best plan for the patient	Competent Plan represents an appropriate clinical option that addresses health concern minimizing patient harm	Capstone Plan represents an appropriate clinical option minimizing patient harm & cost, when necessary
Education and or follow up 20 %	Not acceptable Provides an unrealistic educational and or follow up plan for implementation	Needs Improvement Misses opportunities for proper educational plan / technique instructions	Competent Correctly identifies most opportunities for educational or follow up on most pertinent medical & medication issues	Capstone Identified opportunities are clearly collaborative with other health care professionals and considers systems
Monitoring plan 20 %	Not acceptable Monitoring plan is incomplete or too general to be of value	Needs Improvement Monitoring plan is missing monitoring specifics and is too ambiguous	Competent Monitoring plan establishes parameters and conditions for a strategy but may be lacking detail	Capstone Therapy plans include monitoring specifics appropriate for patient in proper detail with backup therapy if primary plan fails
FORMAT If data is NOT in the proper section (i.e. assessment in plan, disorganized thought process, or has spelling/grammar errors) the student must revise and resubmit

Subjects:

Pharmacy

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric